-->

Monday 19 August 2013

Are you losing count of your employee’s billable hours?

Information taken from Ideaca’s “Revenue Leakage in Professional Services: How to Quash the Silent Killer of Profitability” whitepaper.

Professional services organizations (PSO’s) of all sizes and from all industries struggle to track service hours in a consistent and accurate way. Many organizations use tracking protocols that are inefficient and create challenges for accounting and finance departments. Often these protocols are spreadsheet based and not standardized. As a result, excessive time is spent on consolidation and organization, with hardly any time spent on strategy and analysis.

In many cases, organizations don’t realize where their billable hours are going and that small factors can make a big difference in accurate reporting. The following are examples of some of the small factors that lead to inaccurate time reporting:

  • End of month time tracking: Many people have trouble accurately recalling the hours they worked at the start of the month by the time they submit their hours at the end of the month. Not everyone keeps personal records of their hours and those who don’t rely on memory and guesses.
  • Time entry is late: When time entry is delayed because of vacation, technical difficulties or other causes, it is not always clear when submission deadlines are postponed to. As a result, employees may neglect to submit their time because they are unaware how and when they should.
  • No standardization: Without clearly defined guidelines for tracking time, there may be confusion over what is and is not considered to be billable. Defining ambiguous reporting areas like travel time and administrative work leads to accurate and consistent reporting across the organization.
  • Inaccurate manual processes: As with all manual processes, errors can happen unknowingly. Employees may rush through their time sheet or make costly but minor mistakes when reporting.

Many real-time, accessible and centralized time entry systems are available to empower organizations. Not only do they streamline and increase efficiency of accounting and finance departments, but they benefit employees as well. With accurate information about their hours, employees gain insight into how they directly affect the bottom line and they gain access to metrics about their project or personal hours.

View the full “Revenue Leakage in Professional Services: How to Quash the Silent Killer of Profitability” whitepaper here.

Wednesday 14 August 2013

Statement of Direction for Dynamics AX 2012 "R3"

Microsoft recently released their latest Statement of Direction for Dynamics AX 2012 R3. This new version of AX will be available by Q4 of 2013 and will come with a number of benefits and new capabilities. These include:

Warehouse Management
Advanced warehouse management capabilities will be introduced including embedded RFID, improved warehouse processing and rate, and route and load planning.

Introduction of Demand Planning
There will be new functionality to support SKU-level demand planning based on the Time Series algorithm of SSAS.

Retail
R3 has a strong focus on retail capabilities, with key areas including mobility, clientelling, ecommerce and social.

E-Procurement
Capabilities for purchasing within complex organizations will be enhanced, specifically in the management and control of the RFX (RFI, RFP & RFQ) processes.

Budget Planning
There will be improvements in budget planning capabilities with a focus on supporting the planning needs of complex organizations.


R3 will offer many new and improved capabilities that AX 2012 R2 does not offer. This new version will benefit large and complex organizations the most, especially those with Distribution and Omni-Channel Retail.

The next major version of AX will be released at the end of 2014 and will be called “Rainier.”


Read the full Statement of Direction here.

Questions? Ask one of our consultants.

Tuesday 6 August 2013

Is your website mobile friendly? Here's why it should be.


Many people believe that it is sufficient to only offer desktop computer versions of a website because that’s where people primarily use the internet. However, recent studies by Pew Internet have discovered that this is not the case. Increasing numbers of people primarily use their mobile devices to research or surf the internet. In some cases, these people do not have access to a desktop computer, have to share it, or prefer the convenience of their mobile devices. These mobile-only customers are as valuable as desktop computer users and need access to the same information.

How many people fit into this mobile-only category? A lot, especially young adults between 12 and 29 and low income adults. If your customers fit into either of these categories then it is especially important to make sure your website information comfortably fits onto a mobile screen. Even if your customers do not fit into these categories, more than half of all Americans used their mobile devices to browse the internet in 2012. This means that even if it isn’t your customer’s primary internet method, they may still be accessing your website and information on their mobile devices.

It is important not to force mobile only users to find a desktop computer to access your information. As well, forcing customers to zoom and scroll to navigate a site designed for a much larger screen will only frustrate them and detract from your valuable information and services. The good news is that mobile-only users may access the internet differently but they do not need unique information. The same messaging, content, services and offerings that you share on your website can be duplicated on your mobile site. Even the colors and branding used can and should remain consistent. This means that including a mobile site requires only technical changes and not major messaging or branding shifts.

Embracing customers regardless of the way they browse the internet is the best way to make sure your content is available and accessible. This ensures no potential customers are excluded, no matter the way they choose to browse the internet.

Sources: Pew Internet, Harvard Business Review Blog